A literary analysis of julius caesar

The fickleness of the mob is shown in a spirit of comedy; the antagonism of Marullus and Flavius strikes the note of tragedy. Act I, Scene ii, The supreme characters are introduced, and in their opening speeches each reveals his temperament and foreshadows the part which he will play. The exposition of the situation is now complete.

A literary analysis of julius caesar

He is proud of his reputation for honor and nobleness, but he is not always practical, and is often naive. He is the only major character in the play intensely committed to fashioning his behavior to fit a strict moral and ethical code, but he take actions that are unconsciously hypocritical.

One of the significant themes that Shakespeare uses to enrich the complexity of Brutus involves his attempt to ritualize the assassination of Caesar. He cannot justify, to his own satisfaction, the murder of a man who is a friend and who has not excessively misused the powers of his office.

Consequently, thinking of the assassination in terms of a quasi-religious ritual instead of cold-blooded murder makes it more acceptable to him.

A literary analysis of julius caesar

Unfortunately for him, he consistently misjudges the people and the citizens of Rome; he believes that they will be willing to consider the assassination in abstract terms. Brutus is guided in all things by his concepts of honor.

Literary analysis involves examining all the parts of a novel, play, short story, or poem—elements such as character, setting, tone, and imagery—and thinking about how the author uses those elements to create certain effects. Literary Analysis Questions for Julius Caesar 1. Appreciating Blank Verse. Blank Verse is unrhymed iambic pentameter. Normally, a line of such verse will consist of ten syllables with every second syllable stressed. Julius Caesar Literary Analysis Anonymous 10th Grade In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar, the contrast between honor and power in a leadership position is presented as many individuals work to better Rome with their own ideals of national glory.

He speaks of them often to Cassius, and he is greatly disturbed when events force him to act in a manner inconsistent with them.

Consider his anguish when he drinks a toast with Caesar while wearing a false face to hide his complicity in the conspiracy. Ironically, his widely reputed honor is what causes Cassius to make an all-out effort to bring him into an enterprise of debatable moral respectability.

He is unable to see through the roles being played by Cassius, Casca, and Antony. He does not recognize the bogus letters as having been sent by Cassius, although they contain sentiments and diction that would warn a more perceptive man. Brutus as a naive thinker is most clearly revealed in the scene in the Forum.

He presents his reasons for the assassination, and he leaves believing that he has satisfied the Roman citizens with his reasoned oration. He does not realize that his speech has only moved the mob emotionally; it has not prodded them to make reasoned assessments of what the conspirators have done.

Brutus is endowed with qualities that could make him a successful private man but that limit him severely, even fatally, when he endeavors to compete in public life with those who do not choose to act with the same ethical and moral considerations.

In his scene with Portia, Brutus shows that he has already become alienated with his once happy home life because of his concentration on his "enterprise," which will eventually cause him to lose everything except the belief that he has acted honorably and nobly.

His private life is destroyed, and he also has difficulty avoiding the taint of dishonor in his public life.

Brutus makes moral decisions slowly, and he is continually at war with himself even after he has decided on a course of action. He has been thinking about the problem that Caesar represents to Roman liberty for an unspecified time when the play opens.

His final words, "Caesar, now be still: He quickly takes command of the conspiracy and makes crucial decisions regarding Cicero and Antony.

He does not, however, make adequate plans to solidify republican control of government following the assassination, and he too readily agrees to allow Antony to speak. He has conflicting attitudes toward the conspiracy, but he becomes more favorable following his becoming a member of the plot against Caesar.

He attacks Cassius for raising money dishonestly, yet he demands a portion. Nevertheless, at the end, Brutus is a man who nobly accepts his fate. He dismisses the ghost of Caesar at Sardis. He chooses personal honor over a strict adherence to an abstract philosophy.

In his last moments, he has the satisfaction of being certain in his own mind that he has been faithful to the principles embodying the honor and nobility on which he has placed so much value throughout his life.A Literary Analysis of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare PAGES 2.

WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: william shakespeare, julius caesar, julius caesar film. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. Julius Caesar Literary Analysis Anonymous 10th Grade In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar, the contrast between honor and power in a leadership position is presented as many individuals work to better Rome with their own ideals of national glory.

LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Julius Caesar, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work. Manhood and Honor Logic and Language.

Julius Caesar Study Guide from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes

Analyzing Rhetorical Devices in Julius Caesar Brutus' Speech Brutus speaks to the plebians of Rome to tell them why he killed Caesar so that they will not turn on him.

Literary Analysis Questions for Julius Caesar 1. Appreciating Blank Verse. Blank Verse is unrhymed iambic pentameter. Normally, a line of such verse will consist of ten syllables with every second syllable stressed.

Literary analysis involves examining all the parts of a novel, play, short story, or poem—elements such as character, setting, tone, and imagery—and thinking about .

Analyzing Rhetorical Devices in Julius Caesar by Leah Schick on Prezi